Subject	You had the 555cc's too right ;) lol
Posted by	ZBlacktt on February 18, 2003 at 9:36 PM
	This message has been viewed 70 times.
In Reply To	I did 400rwhp and 440ft.lbs of torque on stock turbos posted by MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) on February 18, 2003 at 08:31 PM
Message	Yea, I remember seeing that in your profile years ago and I wish I knew how to tweak the timing like everyone else too :( .lol. Just didn't want to mess with it because of the damage it could bring and that nobody there at the dyno wasn't sure on doing it, for they never worked on a Z before. STAGE V++++ Going to XV+ and beyond :) Yellow Z STAGE II Going to XI+
Follow Ups	Went to the dyno with Greg Dupree today! - degradated 20:03:48 02/18/03 cant read the little pictures (n/m) - LedZep(Ready for a TT) 20:10:00 02/18/03 holy shit. that is on STOCK turbos??? wow!! great work!!! (n/m) - Pure-Evil 20:14:15 02/18/03 397rwhp 444rwtorque??? are those SAE Corrected numbers??? - Pure-Evil 20:15:07 02/18/03 Shahram (LRD VDR) broke 400rwhp on his stock turbos - KILLR300ZX 20:19:24 02/18/03 ya, but did he have that high a number for RWTorque?? 444 is - Pure-Evil 20:28:19 02/18/03 That's because its the special 94 edition ;-) - ZHOUND 21:55:36 02/18/03 94s are the fastest... - TARGETZ 22:57:12 02/18/03 I did 400rwhp and 440ft.lbs of torque on stock turbos - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 20:31:54 02/18/03 wow. that is amazing...seriously HUGE numbers for stock - Pure-Evil 21:14:41 02/18/03 You had the 555cc's too right ;) lol - ZBlacktt 21:36:31 02/18/03 Stock turbos are stock turbos - U ZCREAM (TTZ in '03) 21:41:53 02/18/03 You missed the point van man ;) - ZBlacktt 22:01:17 02/18/03 yes those are sigma alpha epsilon corrected #s j/k ;-) (n/m) - SL103 20:50:55 02/18/03 very impressive, good job (n/m) - Zeus 20:15:58 02/18/03 Very awesome numbers dude! Congrats! (n/m) - Spee 20:50:09 02/18/03 Do I have to pay 25 cents to view and print the dyno sheet (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 20:54:00 02/18/03 Nope, I'll let ya do it for free. :) (n/m) - degradated 00:58:33 02/19/03 That's awesome bro :) - ZBlacktt 21:22:46 02/18/03 Re: That's awesome bro :) - ZHOUND 21:59:49 02/18/03 You might be kinda right :) - ZBlacktt 22:08:07 02/18/03 Re: That's awesome bro :) - degradated 02:00:42 02/19/03 Oh, I just seen the slicks on your sig and answered >> - ZBlacktt 13:30:19 02/19/03 Killer #'s for stock turbos! Congratz! (n/m) - Some Dude 21:27:33 02/18/03 Nice. - ZHOUND 21:53:29 02/18/03 Actually was thinking of some ET streets.. - degradated 00:57:07 02/19/03 Re: Actually was thinking of some ET streets.. - 91flz 06:26:26 02/19/03 A couple notes for everyone......... - Specialty-Z 22:16:42 02/18/03 what WOULD you reccommend for stock injectors/ic's/turbos - Pure-Evil 22:49:44 02/18/03 ahhh only if we could afford to run 101 octane all the time - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:16:39 02/18/03 Yep 91 octane sucks! (n/m) - Specialty-Z 23:19:31 02/18/03 Simple :) - Specialty-Z 23:17:43 02/18/03 But what was the Inj duty cycle? - Christopher 23:27:33 02/18/03 I would not say it is dangerously high...... - Specialty-Z 23:48:30 02/18/03 What was the EGT's, I guess in this case you could only >> - ZBlacktt 00:12:38 02/19/03 Ryan does not have EGT's on his car..... - Specialty-Z 00:28:23 02/19/03 Agreed - Christopher 00:18:27 02/19/03 Re: Agreed - Specialty-Z 00:37:00 02/19/03 91 octane = bad idea. - ZHOUND 11:20:26 02/19/03 91 octane was a typo, it was 93 (n/m) - Christopher 12:31:01 02/19/03 He wasn't "pulling" timing >> - ChristopherTheOne 10:47:25 02/20/03 Now fix mine so I can do it too :( - SeedyROM 01:46:25 02/19/03 Re: A couple notes for everyone......... - niXit 06:54:29 02/19/03 Congrats bro! (n/m) - SeedyROM 02:04:05 02/19/03 Nice!! (n/m) - Spongerider (Now PFC) 11:10:02 02/19/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.